- Apr 28 Tue 2015 09:16
- Apr 26 Sun 2015 10:56
- Apr 25 Sat 2015 12:42
即使在台灣的報導度不高，卻是歐美很受注目的一個時尚秀品牌，是tumblr 點閱率與搜尋度最高的runway show 品牌之一
Jean Louis Sabaji有些商品讓人退步三舍(這一篇文章我打定主意不列出example，因為你隨意 google一下它歷年的作品就可以明白我說的意思
- Apr 24 Fri 2015 22:08
- Apr 23 Thu 2015 10:27
- Apr 21 Tue 2015 22:11
- Apr 20 Mon 2015 10:18
- Apr 17 Fri 2015 10:22
- Apr 15 Wed 2015 20:28
1.多數的雇主都傾向雇用當地居民或student visa (學生簽證) 擁有者
他們不願雇用working holiday visa 的原因之一是因為多數度假簽的人隨時都可能移動到別的城市，但將簽證改成學生簽需要200 or 300塊澳幣左右，而且前提是必須不間斷的上學(高昂學費支出)。
- Apr 15 Wed 2015 15:55
- Apr 08 Wed 2015 14:29
一張冷峻陽剛的外表 ，聽說他小時候自卑地問過媽媽:「為什麼我長得這麼醜？」五官端正，挺鼻 濃眉 到底哪裡不好呢?游泳健將的他擁有男人夢寐以求的肌肉，倒三角形的結實身形讓他有一票忠實粉絲，唯一承認的女友是合拍韓劇《玻璃鞋》的女主角金賢珠。高三時拍攝廣告出道，據說同時打敗元斌與宋承憲 。他形容：「當時有5個人進入決賽，宋承憲是裡面最好看、身材最好的，他頭髮很短、很會說話，我當時就被他嚇到，心想哪有男生可以長得這麼好看？我一定沒希望了。」自己的單眼皮被很多人嘲笑而勸他不要當演員，結果他憑《電影是電影》榮獲韓國青龍獎及百想藝術大賞男新人獎。
- Apr 08 Wed 2015 12:44
- Apr 07 Tue 2015 14:01
- Apr 05 Sun 2015 15:14
- Apr 02 Thu 2015 22:16
In the first place, it is said before Victorian age, sex drive and sexual intercourse are valued as spontaneous and natural. It is widely believed that the power mechanism of Victorian times disfigures the essence and orientation of sexuality. Undeniably, the advent of Darwinism indirectly serves as an impetus to the occurrence of sexual morality. The hypothesis of Darwinism unprecedentedly juxtaposes human’s sexual intercourse with animalistic instinct. It is widely believed that people of Victorian times are inextricably chained by this hypothesis and contrive to sever the interrelationship between human beings and animal by claiming those who fail to control their sexual desire are inferior human beings. In a sense, the pleasure of sexual intercourse is extremely removed and the bondage followed in the wake of this aforementioned assumption. It is an established fact that sexuality is greatly restricted to the formal purpose of procreation. In this approach, the essence of sexual intercourse is extremely stigmatized and the sexual bondage followed. At root, morality is quintessentially man-made and socially-determined. At any rate, it involves in artificial intervention. The highly-placed people of Victorian contrive to debase the essence of sexuality and view sexuality as something shameful and despicable.
It is widely believe that adultery is a notion heavily associated with disgust and shame. In spite of this understanding, in Moll Flanders and Roxana, it is evident that it is a commonplace thing for men and women to commit adultery. Then, is the society sick or morbid? If the majority represents the norm, can majority just the wrongdoings or manifest true humanity or the nature of sexuality when perversity turns into an overwhelming and overarching social phenomenon?
Still, sex is undeniably treated as a forbidden subject or an unspoken and dangerous subject to engage in conversion on public occasions. In respect to sexual morality, it leads toward a question: are we still situated in the Victorian age? For centuries, Victorian ideology pertaining to sexuality successfully popularized and is forcefully embedded in the minds of everyone that the masses are initially compelled to view sexuality through the lens of morality. At the core, sexual morality dehumanizes human beings by demonizing and annihilating sexual desire and human beings subsequently entered into a mechanized society. The internalization of sexual morality makes it way to the modern world. Therefore, those who infringe the social normality are doomed to endure self-hatred and self-depreciation. Woman who commits sexual deviation are viewed as dangerous victims who harbors bizarre impulse.
In modern times, weighted is judged as incorrigible bondage for women and it becomes a commonplace thing for people to get involved in the so-called abnormal sexual relationship and behaviors such as adultery or sexuality-oriented role play. If the majority represents the norm, can majority just the wrongdoings or manifest true human nature when sexual aberration turns into an overarching social phenomenon?“If the regular sexuality happened to be question once again, it was through a reflux movement”(Foucault 893). At length, it revisits another perennial question: is sexual intercourse natural or shameful? Is it or disgraceful or immoral to embrace and perform lavish sexual practice? Is bizarre sexual fantasy morbid? On the other hand, sexual intercourse is justified and within marriage as a duty but a shame in and out marriage. If sexuality has something to do with shame, then husband and wife are obliged to practice obscenity on a regular basis, which sounds illogical.
- Apr 02 Thu 2015 18:33
- Apr 02 Thu 2015 16:59